Home Lifestyle The AI-enhanced generative Mona Lisa image is spreading

The AI-enhanced generative Mona Lisa image is spreading

by admin

Why are AI enthusiasts so bad at promoting generative AI?

On Twitter, the latest AI trend sees enthusiasts “fill in the gaps” in famous photos, the Mona Lisa painting to famous memesThanks for launching Adobe Firefly, which has a (really impressive) generative fill feature, dubbed Generative Fill.

It is not a new technological development, but it has been greatly improved. Users can now easily replace unwanted elements in a photograph with images that match the general color, or fill in gaps with just a few prompts.

They could also try to “improve” Leonardo da Vinci’s masterpiece, the Mona Lisa painting.

The trend was started by a viral Twitter thread featuring an enlarged image of the Mona Lisa, perched in a bizarre, bumpy landscape. Critics retweeted the photo, commenting that the editing was in poor taste.

MustafaHosny Oh God, Amen to comment It is “actually a great demonstration of what artificial intelligence can do. It doesn’t know to give its legs and add a second horizon above the horizon because it’s not intelligence and it knows nothing.”

a Another viral thread An image from the movie appeared Reservoir dogsto fill in the space outside the frame. He used the same generative fill thread to “zoom out” the film’s close-ups The good, the bad and the uglywhich infuriated moviegoers, who commented that the iconic shots were framed with great care and skill.

These edited photos seem to have been done seriously, with the intention of showing the potential of artificial intelligence. Twitter users were quick to mock the trend.

Obviously, the Generative Fill tool is incredibly useful. It saves time for Photoshop artists and tinkerers who want to experiment with their images. From a technical point of view, it’s really interesting to see how the AI ​​interprets the prompts and the original image, to see what the machine “means” by filling in the blank.

The results are often highly revealing, with the biases of the machines highlighted by wallpaper-like landscapes and hypersexualized images of bulging-chested women contorting in provocative poses.

Of course, the images AI fans choose to promote are equally expressive, and their dark and nihilistic attitude toward art has been noted by many.

On the Internet, AI fans are starting to get a bad rap. Many have compared them to NFT aficionados, who were widely derided for their boundless enthusiasm for ugly art and power-draining techniques.

The explosion of AI art has proven that even powerful tools like generative mobilization cannot replace skill. Creating complex images is getting faster and easier, sure, but intent still matters.

Translated article from the American magazine Forbes – Author: Danny de Placido

<< اقرأ أيضًا: الذكاء الاصطناعي التوليدي في خدمة الموارد البشرية >>>

Related News

Leave a Comment